Editoriais Notícias Editoriais Antigos Arquivo de notícias Calendário Local e Global português | español english | esperanto | | Outras mídias |  | | | | | |  | Publique! Publique o seu vídeo, áudio, imagens e textos diretamente do seu navegador. | Notícias Cobertura imediata dos acontecimentos ligados aos novos movimentos. | Política Editorial Saiba sobre a política de publicação do CMI. | Seja um voluntário Participe desse projeto de democratização da mídia. | Contato Mande sua mensagem para nós. | Ajuda Como publicar as suas notícias em diferentes formatos. | Sobre o CMI Conheça os princípios do Centro de Mídia Independente. | Bate-papo do CMI Acesse a nossa sala de bate-papo. "Saiba como". | Apoie o Indymedia Conheça os outros projetos do CMI e contribua com a mídia independente. | Artigos Escondidos Matérias repetidas, sem conteúdo ou que violam a Política Editorial. | | Rede CMI Brasil |  | | Página estática dos coletivos. | Brasília Campinas Caxias do Sul Curitiba Florianópolis Fortaleza Goiânia Joinville Porto Alegre Rio de Janeiro Salvador São Paulo | | | | Receba o boletim do cmi |  | | | | Busca |  | | | | CMIs |  | www.indymedia.org Projetos da Rede Global impresso rádio tv (newsreal) vídeo Tópicos biotecnologia África áfrica do sul ambazônia estreito de gibraltar ilhas canárias nigéria quênia América Latina argentina bolívia brasil chiapas (mex) chile chile, sul colômbia equador méxico peru porto rico qollasuyu (bol) rosário (arg) santiago (chi) tijuana (mex) uruguai valparaíso (chi) América do Norte canadá hamilton maritimes montreal ontário ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg estados unidos arizona arkansas atlanta austin baía de são francisco baía de tampa baltimore binghamton boston búfalo carolina do norte charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbo danbury, ct estados unidos filadélfia hampton roads, va havaí houston hudson mohawk idaho illinois, sul ítaca kansas city los angeles madison maine massachusetts, oeste miami michigan milwaukee mineápolis/st. paul nova hampshire nova iorque nova jérsei nova orleans novo méxico oklahoma omaha pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego santa bárbara santa cruz, ca são francisco seattle tallahassee tennessee texas, norte urbana-champaign utah vermont washington, dc worcester Ásia burma índia jacarta (ins) japão manila (fil) mumbai (ind) quezon (fil) Europa alemanha alicante (esp) andorra antuérpia (bel) armênia atenas (gre) áustria barcelona (esp) bélgica belgrado (scg) bielorrússia bristol (ing) bulgária chipre croácia escócia estreito de gibraltar euskal herria/país basco flandres ocidental (bel) flandres oriental (bel) galiza grenoble (fra) holanda hungria irlanda istambul (tur) itália la plana (esp) liege (bel) lille (fra) madri (esp) malta marselha (fra) nantes (fra) nice (fra) noruega paris/ilha-de-frança (fra) polônia portugal reino unido romênia rússia suécia suíça tessalônica (gre) toulouse (fra) ucrânia valência Oceania adelaide (aus) aotearoa/nova zelândia brisbane (aus) burma darwin (aus) jacarta (ins) manila (fil) melbourne (aus) oceania perth (aus) quezon (fil) sydney (aus) Oriente Médio armênia beirute (lin) israel palestina Processo discussão faq da indymedia fbi/situação legal listas de discussão processo & docs técnico voluntários | | |
| | The Real Operation to "Rescue" Ingrid Betancourt and US Mercenaries Por Concerned citizens of irc.indymedia.org 05/07/2008 às 02:02 In order to understand the "rescue operation" of Ingrid Betancourt and the Northrop Grumman Corporation mercenaries who were released with her, it is necessary to piece together articles published in the media, filter the content and out of this is formed a true understanding of the facts of what happened here. A version in Portuguese is available here. The Real Operation to "Rescue" Ingrid Betancourt and US MercenariesAuthor: Concerned citizens of irc.indymedia.orgIn order to understand the "rescue operation" of Ingrid Betancourt and the Northrop Grumman Corporation mercenaries who were released with her, it is necessary to piece together articles published in the media, filter the content and out of this is formed a true understanding of the facts of what happened here. A version in Portuguese is available here. - On June 3rd, Colombian Senator Piedad Cordoba revealed that she possessed information that the government of Colombia was negotiating a deal with FARC to trade money for the release of Betancourt and the mercenaries. The official policy of the United States is that they don't "negotiate with terrorists," even as many leaders of Latin American countries accuse President Uribe of supporting the AUC paramilitary death squads and accuse the United States of providing safe harbor to known terrorists such as Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles.
- Careful observers began to question the strange circumstances under which the "dramatic rescue" of Ingrid Betancourt happened. Some guys with Che Guevara t-shirts simply showed up and redirected them into another helicopter? If it were that easy, why didn't they do that years ago? The French media also found strange the fact that Betancourt didn't resemble the gaunt and hungry images we have been seeing in the media -- she seemed well-fed and healthy, as if she were being prepared for release.
- More confusion came when the capitalist media seized this opportunity to hack up Betancourt's press conference, keeping in the parts that glorified Uribe and the United States and excluding the parts that talked about Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Ecuador's Rafael Correa and their important efforts in finding a diplomatic, peaceful solution to the crisis. The press conference was broadcast in its entirety on the Latin American news network, Telesur, but only bit and pieces were shown on CNN (english channel), Fox News and other northern news channels. For instance, excluded from the edited version is Betancourt's comments that she felt used by the whole situation and that the operation put the lives of the hostages at risk while a diplomatic solution, like the one pursued by President Chavez, would ensure their safety.
- The capitalist media, without any shame, immediately began to use the situation to promote their own political objectives: everywhere in the corporate media, Uribe was lauded as a hero, FARC's days are numbered and Chavez's successful and peaceful diplomacy that freed other FARC-held prisoners was downplayed.
- However, on Friday, information began to be revealed that, in reality, the government of Colombia had secretly paid $20 million USD to FARC in exchange for the release of Betancourt and the US mercenaries, confirming what Senator Cordoba had said a month before. This story was broken by MediaPart in France and Radio Suisse Romande. MediaPart also reported that France and Colombia guaranteed safe asylum for some members of FARC as part of the deal.
- Dominique Moisi, one of France's most prominent foreign policy experts, said that it was "probable" that FARC was given money in exchange for the prisoners. "They were bought in order to turn them around, like Mafia chiefs," he said on French state television.
- In light of all these events, the government of Ecuador has suspended diplomatic relations with Colombia.
- The report of the $20 million pay-off is now rapidly circulating throughout the corporate media as it struggles with a way to spin this news. The confusion caused by this bizarre operation makes a lot more sense when viewed as a pre-arranged, money-for-prisoners exchange. And, the true face of the Latin American right-wing is once again exposed.
- It is worth repeating that along with Betancourt, also released were private military contractors from the United States who were captured when their surveillance plane went down in FARC-controlled territory during a Plan Colombia operation. Northrop Grumman, an aerospace and arms manufacturing firm, was awarded a $60 million contract to provide logistical support to the US and Colombian military, on the ground in war zones there. Between 1990 and 2002, Northrop Grumman contributed $8.5 million to federal campaigns. Coincidentally, at least "seven former officials, consultants or shareholders of Northrop Grumman" have held posts in the Bush administration, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis Libby (who was convicted on obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury and making false statements to federal investigators for his role in illegally "outing" CIA agent Valerie Plame). In addition, Plan Colombia has been repeatedly criticized by international human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and the United Nations, for maintaining close relationships with right-wing death squads, providing direct assistance to illegal right-wing terrorist organizations as well as directly and indirectly participating in massacres and atrocities. Many of the right-wing terrorists operating in Colombia are former members of the Colombian military, like paramilitary commander "Yair," who openly support Plan Colombia and publicly offer their support to Plan Colombia operations.
- Finally, it should be noted that the Colombian government under Uribe, who has enjoyed widespread celebration by the corporate press in the last few days, is routinely condemned as having one of the worst human rights records of any country in the world. More than 60 members of President Uribe's congressional coalition are under investigation for election fraud or collaborating with right-wing groups classified as "terrorist organizations" by the United States. Colombia is the most dangerous country in the world for labor union organizers, with the world's highest rate of assassinations and extra-judicial executions of trade unionists. Since Plan Colombia began, the United States has provided over $4.7 billion to the government of Colombia, described by Senator Cordoba as a "democracy that governs through fear and terror." Senator Cordoba, herself, was kidnapped by 12 heavily-armed government-affiliated terrorists. Senator Cordoba says that the operations of Plan Colombia are only partly used to fight the so-called "war on drugs": "It's also used to silence those of us who speak out against the government. They try to silence us by kidnapping, disappearing and even killing many of us." Unlike many other Latin American countries, who overthrew the brutal US-backed dictatorships which ruled the continent during much of the 20th century, Colombia is an active reminder of what life used to be like throughout all of South America -- fiercely repressive dictatorships which terrorize the population with money and weapons provided by the United States in exchange for support of U.S. policies. How can a government like this receive the kind of tributes and congratulations that have been showered on them by the capitalist press in the last few days since they traded $20 million for the release of Ingrid Betancourt and U.S. mercenaries? How can a supposedly free and democratic media uncritically praise a government like this?
Today, Fidel Castro made one of the most sensible declarations about this situation: the imprisonment of civilians is wrong but what is worse is that the United States and the western, capitalist press are exploiting this situation to obscure and justify the genocidal horrors that they have imposed on Latin America for hundreds of years, up to and including this very day. Even now, the soldiers of Plan Colombia and their right-wing death squads continue murdering union leaders in cold blood, continue terrorizing the civilian population of Colombia, and continue protecting terrorists who hunt down and kill anyone seeking social justice in the region, a cause that threatens the profit and power of the dominant, ruling class. Even when the United States and their Latin American allies attempt to create a spectacle of positive public relations for themselves, their hands are so bloody and their crimes are so deep that, in the end, their fabrications do little to change the reality on the ground. Like all dictatorships in human history, their lies are so transparent, their brutality is so brazen and their lifespan is so limited.
>>Adicione um comentário There are so many factual errors in this piece of crap story that it is not even worth commenting on. For example, point 5 is simply BS, they had broken relations much earlier. Piedad Cordoba has been claiming things for a year without anything happening. Finally, the writer did not even bother to read how the operation was set up by the "capitalistic" media. Ingrid Betancourt was never an Uribe fan, she was there, but the writer of this piece claims to know more. What a farce!  | If there are "so many" factual errors as Lurker Adams says, wouldn't there be more than just the couple semi-coherent errors that are pointed out?
First, regarding Point #5 from the original article. Note that the article does not say that Ecuador suspended diplomatic relations with Colombia -because- of the Betancourt incident, nor does it say -when- diplomatic relations were severed. It clearly says "In light of all these events [...]", referring to Uribe's connections with right-wing terrorists, Uribe's hostile relationship with Chavez and Correa, etc. The reason it was included in the article is because during Telesur's in-depth coverage of the Betancourt story, they repeatedly played a segment which discussed the diplomatic break between Colombia and Ecuador and said that the difference in strategies regarding the FARC prisoners (diplomacy with the Red Cross for Chavez/Correa vs. a potentially dangerous and fake military operation from Uribe) was contributing to the on-going diplomatic rift. If the original article had said that Ecuador broke ties BECAUSE of the Betancourt incident, I could understand the criticism. But that's not what it says and the article is following Telesur's lead on this one.
The second "factual error" that Lurker Adams writes is where he starts to become incoherent: "Piedad Cordoba has been claiming things for a year without anything happening." What "things" has Senator Cordoba been "claiming" for a year? I should also remind Lurker Adams that the specific news about the $20 million pay-off didn't come from Senator Cordoba.
If the last two sentences are intended to point out more "factual errors," I can't figure out what they are. The original article never suggests that Betancourt was an Uribe fan and I don't even know what the other sentence is supposed to mean.
Sorry, Lurker Adams, pointing out "factual errors" doesn't seem to be something you're very good at. Since you were barely able to try to point out just one "factual error," I don't think that qualifies as "so many" ... in fact, I think it counts as one and I think I've clearly explained how it's not a "factual error" at all.
I stand by the article.  | On June 3rd, Colombian Senator Piedad Cordoba revealed that she possessed information that the government of Colombia was negotiating a deal with FARC to trade money for the release of Betancourt and the mercenaries. Wow, this is really breaking news: that Piedad Cordoba watches television. ¡Que milagro! From France24 a week before: ?In a potentially major breakthrough, just after Colombia confirmed the death of FARC leader Manuel Marulanda, Uribe said "the government has received calls from the FARC in which some of the leaders announced their decision to leave the FARC and hand over Ingrid Betancourt if their freedom is guaranteed. "The government's answer is 'yes, they are guaranteed freedom'" if they handed over hostages, Uribe said. In a speech carried live on national television, Uribe said those leaders of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) who free the captives could be turned over to authorities from "France, so that they enjoy that freedom there." The president also touted the government's offer to reward rebels up to a total of 100 million dollars when they turn themselves in alongside one or more hostages. You would be more credible if you dealt with facts instead of rants. Here is what the New York Times has to say about the murder of trade union members in Colombia. ?Most human-rights groups cite the union numbers and conclude, as Human Rights Watch did this year, that ?Colombia has the highest rate of violence against trade unionists in the world.? Even if that is true, it was far safer to be in a union than to be an ordinary citizen in Colombia last year. The unions report that they have 1 million members. Thirty-nine killings in 2007 is a murder rate of 4 unionists per 100,000. There were 15,400 homicides in Colombia last year, not counting combat deaths, according to the national police. That is a murder rate of 34 citizens per 100,000.? Many in Congress, moreover, assume that ?assassinations? means murders that are carried out for union activity. But the union research center says that in 79 percent of the cases going back to 1986, it has no suspect or motive. The government doesn?t either. When the Inter American Press Association several years ago investigated its list of murdered Colombian journalists, it found that more than 40 percent were killed for nonjournalistic reasons. The unions have never done a similar investigation. Note also that Venezuela, a nation at peace, has a higher murder rate than Colombia, a nation at war: 49 versus 37.3 per thousand. The murder rate in Venezuela has more than doubled since Chavez took office: 22 in 1998. From 1993 to present, the murder rate in Colombia has fallen in half.  | First, the reports from French and Swiss media do not indicate that a "reward" was given to a FARC "traitor" -- it indicates that $20 million was given -to FARC- (and possibly safe asylum for some of their members) in return for Betancourt's and the US mercenaries' release.
Furthermore, Colombia's government -denies- this happened. If it were part of some standard deal, why would they cover it up?
Also, gringo, -you- would be more credible if you cited some sources for your so-called facts. I've already cited my facts and you can find them linked above.
If you think a narco-linked, terrorist-linked president is how to run a democracy ... well, then you must be from the United States because that's the kind of president the US has, also!
 | The point I was making regarding Piedad Cordoba is simply that while you act as if she had been the possessor of some great news that very few others else knew about, she was simply recycling what Uribe had said on TV the week before.
As the Colombian government had already publicly stated that it would hand over $ for Betancourt?s freedom, then if this had actually occurred, why would they not admit it?
I had embedded links on my posting, but your software is too primitive or non-standard to pick them up. I put the initial quote regarding Piedad Cordoba in bold face, using the standard HTML tags, for example, which your software doesn't pick up. Most of my posting consisted of quotes from sources. I embedded the links. I listed sources If you had bothered to Google some of my posting you should be able to find sources, as I had QUOTED extensively from other sources. Not only did I include links, I also STATED two of my three sources: France24 and NYT.
In one sense your talking about sources is a shell game, because if you knew what you were talking about, you would have easily been able to refute/confirm the data I quoted regarding murder rates of union members compared to murder rates of population as a whole for Colombia, and murder rates over time for Colombia and Venezuela By comparison, I looked at other sources than the NYT regarding murder rates of union members in Colombia versus murder rates of ordinary Colombians, and came up with similar rates, though not exactly the same.
If you want to see sources that are given in embedded links,then you should strongly consider updating your software. It is unfair of you to make statements about my credibility when I included sources embedded in links, sources which your primitive or nonstandard software did not picke up. If you want sources, then you need to give posters the ability to supply them, which you have not. I supplied sources, and your software wiped them out.
Sources given in my posting. To assist you, as apparently you need it.
Murder rates: Wikipedia. Type in ?murder rates? in the Wikepedia Search place. NYT: 3/29/2008 "Killing a Trade Pact." ( In posting, I stated that NYT was a source) France 24 article: "Uribe: FARC top leader dead, possible release for Betancourt," Sunday 25 May 2008. (In posting, I stated that France24 was a source.)
Yes, my tone is rather snarky, but I am simply replying in kind. If you snark someone, you get snark back. For example: I made no gratuitous insults about your country of origin, whereas you made gratuitous insults about mine. It would appear that you do not react kindly to facts that refute your point of view: thus the insults.
BTW, if you consider Fidel a credible person and someone who has done much for Cuba, I suggest that you find this article. ?RENAISSSANCE AND DECAY: A COMPARISON OF. SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATORS IN PRE-CASTRO AND. CURRENT-DAY CUBA.?
Do your impeccable French and Swiss sources regarding the alleged $20 million inform you about Omar Arturo Zabala, currently residing in Switzerland? Why only anonymous sources? How credible are anonymous sources? Anonymous sources are more credible than data that can be easily verified from multiple sources? Ya ya?
BTW, is there any relation between Ecuador suspending diplomatic relations w Colombia and what Correa has recently done with regard to various media outlets in Ecuador?
Caracas Chronicles has a very good fisking of an ignorant and/or lying British journalist?s take on Venezuela and Betancourt published in the Independent.
IndyMedia or PSFMedia? Esperanto?  | "The point I was making regarding Piedad Cordoba is simply that while you act as if she had been the possessor of some great news that very few others else knew about, she was simply recycling what Uribe had said on TV the week before."
Yeah, but your point is stupid. The reason for quoting Piedad Cordoba is that she was revealing she had knowledge than an operation was already underway which could risk the lives of the hostages and that the country should know about it. This was NOT revealed by the Colombian government, until AFTER the operation was over. That's the reason Point #1 exists. Do you get it now?
"As the Colombian government had already publicly stated that it would hand over $ for Betancourt?s freedom, then if this had actually occurred, why would they not admit it?"
Another way to pose your question is: if it's not such a big deal that they paid off FARC for her release, why are they rushing to deny it? Why has this news now spread all over the internet? (There are now over 20,000 references to the article in Google.) Perhaps because it takes the wind out of their James Bond story of a sophisticated intelligence operation that really just boils down to a pay-off?
"I had embedded links on my posting, but your software is too primitive or non-standard to pick them up."
It isn't our fault if you don't know how to use the internet.
"In one sense your talking about sources is a shell game, because if you knew what you were talking about, you would have easily been able to refute/confirm the data..."
Blah blah blah. Your statistics are meaningless without substance to back them up. Who knows why murders are increasing in Caracas? It could easily be a covert war against the CIA-sponsored mercenaries at work in Venezuela. Here are the facts:
1. Uribe is well-known all over the world for being tied to right-wing death squads. You can't change that fact.
2. Uribe is well-known for working with illegal drug cartels. You can't change that fact.
3. Colombia -is- the most dangerous place in the world for trade unionists because Plan Colombia is used to suppress leftist movements in Colombia. You can't change that fact.
4. Plan Colombia has repeatedly been criticized by human rights organizations for torture, well-known massacres, illegal detentions, and support of illegal right-wing terrorist organizations. You can't change that fact.
I understand that your strategy is to divert attention from these well-documented facts by some blah blah about murder rates and statistics and whatever else but the above -facts- are enough to indict Uribe and everyone in Washington who sings his praises. They are all war criminals who should be in jail.
"BTW, is there any relation between Ecuador suspending diplomatic relations w Colombia and what Correa has recently done with regard to various media outlets in Ecuador?"
Mmmm... no. It has everything to do with Colombia's illegal invasion of Ecuador that brought the region to the brink of war. But your wing-nut speculation here is helpful for me to illustrate how far off you are from reality.
Sorry, buddy. Start addressing the FACTS about Uribe, about his ties to right-wing terrorists, about the US's protection of terrorists like Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch and quit focusing on some murder rate statistic and then we can have a conversation. Consider yourself owned.  | Colombian President Alvaro Uribe acknowledged that his army used the Red Cross emblem -- A WAR CRIME THE VIOLATES THE GENEVA CONVENTION -- in their "operation" ... after previously denying OVER AND OVER AGAIN that they DIDN'T do this ... HOW CAN WE TRUST ANYTHING THIS LYING, TERRORIST GOVERNMENT SAYS?
well, gringo????? got an answer for this one?
|